What is the technology acceptance model?
The justified event is the theory developed by Icek Ajzen and Martin Fishbein in 1975 and based on the theory of information integration. It deals with the relationship of belief in behavior. The theory of justified action (TRA) predicts that personal attitudes and social standards are two factors that control the intention of behavior. Personal attitudes consist of evaluation and power of faith, while social standards include components of normative beliefs and motivating to adhere to these beliefs. The technology acceptance model (there) is a specific application of a justified action on the situation of a person considering accepting a specific type of innovation, ie software. In addition, the research of the recruitment model focused on both very specific areas of software and exp.a to other areas. Specific software areas that have been studied include text processing, taxes for tax preparation, e -mail and voicemail, building management systems, and marketing support systems.
areas outside the discrete software applications that have been studied include combinations of software and services, especially in the online environment. For example, reflections on the use, acceptance or commitment to commercial websites, electronic stores, electronic regulations, internet banking, group package and electronic collaboration, electronic supermarket, moderated group chat, distance education, websites and digital libraries are included. The study was extended to include hardware and software, and the focus of various studies included the use of computers in the workplace, accepting cell phones, and integrating telemedicine technology. Specific reactions to the adoption of software at specific places such as a particular country have also been studied.
Key concepts that are still discussed in relation to the model of receiving technology, including at least some of its adaptations and extensions, include perceived easy use, perceivedou usefulness (PU), intention of behavior (bi) and real behavior (b). Discussions about scientists focus on the relationships of these four variables and emphasize that Peou partly determines PU, but Peou cannot align the lack of PU resulting from other factors. Some scientists have focused on identifying other variables, and those most often mentioned include computer anxiety, compatibility, computational support, pleasure, experience, self -sufficiency, system quality and training.