What is the validity of the face?
If the test seems to be valid for participants or observers, it is reportedly valid for the face. Face validity is one of the many parameters used to assess the value of the experiment or test and to collect information about how the experiment was carried out and how the results will be applicable. However, this is not a perfect measurement, because the assessment of the face validity is very based on personal experience; What seems valid and reasonable to one person may seem weak to another. A researcher who wants to try something in the experimental situation would invent a test, and then ask for a review from peers to determine whether the test is ethical and whether the test really measure what the creator thinks. For example, a researcher who wanted to test the vocabulary of young children, and some people could agree that the experiment is valid for the face, because it would seem that vocabulary skills in test entities would seem to measure.
The problem of face validity can be very complex with multiple nuanced experiments. The more detailed and complicated the experiment is, the more complicated it can be to determine the validity of the face. For example, experts in the field can say that the test is not valid, while the laymen may have the test explained and think it sounds quite reasonable. This is one of the reasons why people are expected to submit the proposed experiments to inspect a group of their peers and ask for mutual evaluation for their results before publishing so that experts can consider the situation.
When evaluating the experiment with the validity of the face, several things are considered. The first is a simple scale of whether to do what to do. The consistency of aspolehliness is also concerned; Reviewers want to know that the results are reliable and that the results are repeatable. If the test protocol cannot be repeated, the scientific community will be considered as questionable.
Application for evaluation of face validity is always good nost. Having a fresh pair of eyes to examine the protocol or the planned test can point out shortcomings and problems that creators may not be obvious. The reviews also give the creators a chance to get feedback before starting, which can allow the creators of tests to modify the test before starting startup or specifically address specific concerns when enrolling the results.