What is an interview with an adult attachment?

The

interview for adults, which is most often associated with Mary Main researchers and its collaborators, is a semi -structured interview, which generally consists of about 20 questions. It is based on the principle of the cooperative principle of Paul Grice - a short set of standard conversational expectations that consist of a relationship, method, quality and quantity. The purpose of this interview is to enable the administration of the researcher to evaluate the internal representation of the child's attachment of the interviewed adult. Information spent from these interviews can then be used to assess how the interviewees deal with the identification, prevention and protection of themselves from possible danger, especially in intimate relationships. However, both differ in the fact that the former evaluates childhood links, while the other usually focuses only on romantic relationships. Despite the threshold that the purpose of an adult connection is usually to assess how one interacts with others in different situations, including romantic, is generally evaluated by children's Ptearing to the nuclear family.

When performing an adult conversation that may take 60 to 90 minutes, the interviewer often asks the interviewed to consider memories related to his childhood attaching, while retaining a clear and thoughtful dialogue with the interviewer. During this dialogue, the interviewee is usually asked to think about attachment and their influences; current relationship with parents and possibly children; past traumatic experiences; And loss of loved ones. This discourse is then rewritten and scored, usually evaluates the coherence of every answer. The score of these interviews is said to complain that he is almost always carried out by a professional who has received extensive training in this particular area.

In general, there are three classifications that may arise from an adult interview: safe autonomous, non -autonomous and uncertain. The adult, which is placed in the Secure-Autonomous category, will generally provideA call that is open, lively and honest, although related to difficult past events. On the other hand, non -autonomous and uncertain interviewees can present one of the three patterns during the interview. These formulas fall under the titles of release, biased and unresolved. The refused discourse formula will usually be short, generalized and shows many contradictions; Discourse dealing is often detailed, incoherent and sometimes branched into irrelevant chatting; While unresolved patterns will regularly show disorganization of thinking and can consist of many extended silence.

A secured autonomous person may have a vim converted about the topic, even painful, such as abuse, if it has dealt with what happened. The rejected person tends to minimize the importance of personal relations and instead has become highly independent. The employed person is too involved in the revival of the past to clearly talk about it during the interview. An unresolved person shows signs of outages in reason, especially if it istraumatic events. The "unresolved" is the title listed in conjunction with one of the other three classifications than in itself.